Maintenance window scheduled to begin at February 14th 2200 est. until 0400 est. February 15th


Forgot Password?

    Defense Visual Information Distribution Service Logo

    NATO Review: Ukraine-Russia Conflict: Has Globalization Helped or Hindered Responses?

    Advanced Embed Example

    Add the following CSS to the header block of your HTML document.

    Then add the mark-up below to the body block of the same document.



    Courtesy Video


    Countries have increased their links in a smaller, globalised world. But reactions to Russia's actions in Ukraine mean that a brake has to be put on some of this interlinking. Has globalisation made it easier or more difficult to react? Has it made it impossible to punish Russia without suffering pain at home? And where next for the sanctions and counter-sanctions?

    00.09 - Paul King – Editor, NATO Review – voice-over
    Globalisation has made all of our lives more dependent on each other. As barriers fall and unions are built, the idea is that all of us stand to lose more in conflicts in a globalised world. But will this idea prove true in dealing with Russia’s activities in Ukraine?

    00.27 – Liam Fox – Former UK Secretary of Defence
    The great upside of globalisation should be that greater interdependence economically and should make countries less willing to be aggressive, but it is of course based on the fundamental premise that all countries are equally rational.

    00.45 – Alex Petriashvili – State Minister of Georgia on European and Euro-Atlantic Integration
    Europe is opening borders and giving the opportunities to build bridges. As we see, the Russian Federation is trying to build new fences, new barbed wires on our territory. It is time to build bridges and to forget about the fences.

    01.05 - Paul King – voice-over
    But globalisation does not automatically lead to peace, either today or in previous examples of close relationships.

    01.15 – Prof Julian Lindley-French – Director, Europa Analytica
    Well this is not the first age of globalisation, the 19th century was. A hundred years ago there were many, even at this late date before the outbreak of World War I, who said: We are not going to war because we’re too economically interdependent.

    01.26 – Rob De Wijk – Founder Hague Centre for Strategic Studies
    Globalisation is going on for decades. It’s not something new. No, what is new, is the shift in balance of power in the world and the shifting centre of gravity, the economic shifting of gravity; and consequently the political centre of gravity, which is shifting to the East. What’s happening at the Crimea is very comparable to what’s happening right now in the South-China Sea.

    01.58 - Paul King – voice-over
    So, globalisation has spawned its own conflicts, not got rid of them. And security has become even more important for the economic development that globalisation is supposed to bring.

    02.09 – Ten Jianqun – Director, China Institute of International Studies, Beijing
    In recent years the South-China Sea has become a hot spot. The security, you know, should be two sides of one coin: one economy, another is security.

    02.21 - Paul King – voice-over
    And it’s not just conflicts, which highlight the changing landscape. Where security forces are positioned is also part of the shifting sands.

    02.31 – Ten Jianqun – Director, China Institute of International Studies, Beijing
    I think China is the largest contributor among P5 in peacekeeping troops in Africa.

    02.40 - Paul King – voice-over
    Using economics as a weapon can hurt in a globalised world, but this is no guarantee that it will have the desired effect.
    02.48 – Prof Julian Lindley-French – Director, Europa Analytica
    Yes, economic sanctions, economic penalties, costs rather than benefits for inappropriate action… They are calculated as part of the broad remit of choices that a state makes. But if a state or a regime becomes sufficiently committed to a cause of action for reasons that may not be immediately apparent to those outside of that state, then no amount of economic sanction will actually work if that state or regime believes it’s fundamental to its very survival.

    03.23 - Paul King – voice-over
    And finally, it’s ironically probably the national, not the international, globalised audiences that matter most in the recent moves by President Putin.

    03.34 – Konstantin von Eggert – Kommersant FM Radio, Editor in Chief
    We somehow forgot that there is a huge domestic angle to all these things. It is about Putin’s new legitimacy. Yes, he’s officially president, but he’s in fact a national leader who does not just ensure economic stability. Actually, that’s probably not as important to him as it used to be in his first presidential term, but more about him giving Russia a new face, a new spring in Russia’s step and a new image for himself.

    NATO Review

    The opinions expressed in NATO Review do not necessarily reflect those of NATO or its member countries.

    This video contains footage from ITN. While this video may be reproduced and used in its entirety, ITN footage cannot be used as part of a new production.



    Date Taken: 11.25.2014
    Date Posted: 11.28.2014 14:44
    Category: Package
    Video ID: 377859
    Filename: DOD_102115296
    Length: 00:04:21
    Location: BRUSSELS, BRU, BE

    Video Analytics

    Downloads: 26
    High-Res. Downloads: 26