In this episode we discuss the jurisdiction and authority of the Courts of Criminal Appeals and the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces to address alleged errors in post-trial actions that indicate firearms restrictions under 18 U.S.C. § 922. We cover distinctions from the CAAF’s Williams opinion from last term, timing for when the judgment is entered into the record, and the specific authority of the Courts of Criminal Appeals to provide appropriate relief for errors after the judgment is entered.
Learn more about The Quill & Sword series of podcasts by visiting our podcast page at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/thequillandsword. The Quill & Sword show includes featured episodes from across the JAGC, plus all episodes from our four separate shows: “Criminal Law Department Presents” (Criminal Law Department), “NSL Unscripted” (National Security Law Department), “The FAR and Beyond” (Contract & Fiscal Law Department) and “Hold My Reg” (Administrative & Civil Law Department). Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
| Date Taken: | 11.05.2025 |
| Date Posted: | 11.05.2025 11:03 |
| Category: | Interviews |
| Audio ID: | 88858 |
| Filename: | 2511/DOD_111369309.mp3 |
| Length: | 00:22:22 |
| Location: | US |
| Web Views: | 3 |
| Downloads: | 0 |
| High-Res. Downloads: | 0 |
This work, The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 62: United States v. Johnson (C.A.A.F. 2025), must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright.
