Maintenance window scheduled to begin at February 14th 2200 est. until 0400 est. February 15th

(e.g. yourname@email.com)

Forgot Password?

    Defense Visual Information Distribution Service Logo

    Air Force Judge Advocate Generals School Podcast - 8. JAG Successfully Argues before US Supreme Court with Captain Thomas Govan - Part 2

    Air Force Judge Advocate Generals School Podcast - 8. JAG Successfully Argues before US Supreme Court with Captain Thomas Govan - Part 2

    Advanced Embed Example

    Add the following CSS to the header block of your HTML document.

    Then add the mark-up below to the body block of the same document.

    This is Part 2 of the interview with Captain Thomas Govan on his experience in arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court in October 2018 in the case of Vernon Madison v. State of Alabama. In this Part 2, we dive into Captain Govan's experience in oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court and some of his main takeaways. If you didn’t hear Part 1, please do, where we discuss an overview of the case, how Captain Govan became involved and selected to present oral argument, and the preparation he took leading up to the day of oral argument.

    Summary for the case of Madison v. State of Alabama:

    The US Supreme Court held in a 5-3 decision with the State of Alabama that the 8th Amendment permits a state to execute a prisoner who no longer remembers the crime. However, the Court held that a state cannot execute an individual who fails to rationally understand the reason for execution, whether that reason is due to psychosis or dementia. Justice Kagan authored the Court’s majority opinion and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan. The dissent included Justice Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. Justice Cavanagh had not yet taken the bench.

    The majority opinion followed the precedents set in the seminal cases of Ford v. Wainwright, 1986, and Panetti v. Quarterman, 2007, where the Court held the 8th Amendment prohibits executing a prisoner who lost his/her “sanity” in that “killing one who has no capacity” to understand the crime or punishment “simply offends humanity.” And that there is no “retributive value” in executing a person who has no comprehension of the sentence.

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    AUDIO INFO

    Date Taken: 02.21.2020
    Date Posted: 02.27.2020 12:22
    Category: Newscasts
    Audio ID: 62976
    Filename: 2002/DOD_107691703.mp3
    Length: 00:33:19
    Artist The Air Force Judge Advocate General's School
    Year 2019
    Location: AL, US

    Web Views: 70
    Downloads: 1
    High-Res. Downloads: 1

    PUBLIC DOMAIN