WEBVTT

00:04.505 --> 00:07.146
- Hello, and welcome to the Washington Foreign Press Center.

00:07.146 --> 00:10.966
Today we have Acting Assistant Secretary, Susan Thornton

00:10.966 --> 00:14.160
from our East Asian and Pacific Affairs Bureau

00:14.160 --> 00:18.327
to discuss the upcoming trip of Secretary Tillerson to Asia.

00:19.151 --> 00:23.318
Without further ado, here's the Acting Assistant Secretary.

00:25.694 --> 00:28.027
- Thanks again, Andy.
- Sure.

00:29.649 --> 00:31.735
- So good afternoon, everyone.

00:31.735 --> 00:33.971
- [Reporters] Good afternoon.

00:33.971 --> 00:35.378
- It's a packed house.

00:35.378 --> 00:37.396
Well, of course, as Andy mentioned,

00:37.396 --> 00:40.876
you know that Secretary Tillerson is about to take off

00:40.876 --> 00:45.043
actually tomorrow for a trip out to Northeast Asia,

00:45.044 --> 00:46.961
his first trip to Asia.

00:47.228 --> 00:51.395
And we're gonna be visiting Tokyo, Seoul and Beijing.

00:51.750 --> 00:55.167
Tokyo on March 15th, Seoul on March 17th,

00:55.671 --> 00:58.631
and then we travel to Beijing on March 18th.

00:58.631 --> 01:02.798
So the idea is that this trip will allow Secretary Tillerson

01:02.803 --> 01:06.970
to engage allies and partners on not only a range of

01:07.541 --> 01:11.708
bilateral issues, but also importantly to discuss and

01:11.983 --> 01:15.752
coordinate strategy to address the advancing nuclear missile

01:15.752 --> 01:17.752
threat from North Korea.

01:18.898 --> 01:21.800
The United States is committed to holding North Korea

01:21.800 --> 01:25.883
accountable for its flagrant and repeated disregard

01:25.883 --> 01:29.452
of U.N. Security Council resolutions, which expressly

01:29.452 --> 01:33.619
prohibit its ballistic missile and nuclear programs.

01:34.721 --> 01:37.591
We will defend our friends and allies, of course,

01:37.591 --> 01:41.181
the Republic of Korea and Japan, and seek to work

01:41.181 --> 01:44.833
collaboratively to the maximum extent possible with

01:44.833 --> 01:48.500
important partners like China on this issue.

01:48.991 --> 01:52.031
In Tokyo Secretary Tillerson is planning to meet with

01:52.031 --> 01:55.164
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, and also of course,

01:55.164 --> 01:57.664
with Foreign Minister Kishida.

01:57.719 --> 02:00.753
This trip builds on Prime Minister Abe's summit meeting

02:00.753 --> 02:04.514
with President Trump in Washington and in Florida

02:04.514 --> 02:08.160
earlier last month, February 10th through 12th.

02:08.160 --> 02:11.109
And Secretary Tillerson, of course, has also connected

02:11.109 --> 02:14.760
frequently with Foreign Minister Kishida, including by phone

02:14.760 --> 02:17.792
on February 7th, and in a meeting the two held here

02:17.792 --> 02:19.209
on February 10th.

02:20.594 --> 02:24.761
In Korea, as President Trump has stated, strong U.S.-Japan

02:26.744 --> 02:29.953
bilateral relations serve as the cornerstone of peace

02:29.953 --> 02:33.128
and security in the Asia-Pacific region.

02:33.128 --> 02:36.420
In Tokyo the Secretary will also discuss our shared regional

02:36.420 --> 02:40.105
and global objectives, including strengthening security

02:40.105 --> 02:43.041
cooperation within the U.S.-Japan alliance,

02:43.041 --> 02:45.717
working together to enhance a rules-based system

02:45.717 --> 02:49.884
in the maritime domain, and particularly exploring efforts

02:50.296 --> 02:54.296
to deepen U.S.-Japan-ROK trilateral cooperation.

02:54.848 --> 02:58.569
In Seoul the Secretary will meet with Acting President

02:58.569 --> 03:01.819
Hwang Kyo-ahn and Foreign Minister Yun.

03:02.367 --> 03:04.441
This will be the Secretary's first meeting with

03:04.441 --> 03:06.358
Acting President Hwang.

03:06.869 --> 03:09.695
His last bilateral meeting with Foreign Minister Yun

03:09.695 --> 03:12.919
was in Bonn, Germany, where he also participated in a

03:12.919 --> 03:16.185
trilateral meeting with the Foreign Ministers of both Japan

03:16.185 --> 03:17.518
and South Korea.

03:19.129 --> 03:21.995
While in Seoul the Secretary will convey the U.S. continued

03:21.995 --> 03:26.162
support for of course the strong U.S.-ROK alliance.

03:26.586 --> 03:29.666
And he will then travel to Beijing on March 18th,

03:29.666 --> 03:33.091
where he'll meet with State Counselor Yang Jiechi

03:33.091 --> 03:35.085
and Foreign Minister Wang Yi,

03:35.085 --> 03:39.252
as well as with President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang.

03:39.699 --> 03:42.728
President Trump and President Xi Jinping spoke by telephone

03:42.728 --> 03:46.395
on February 9th, and after first speaking to

03:46.674 --> 03:50.591
State Counselor Yang by phone on February 21st,

03:52.774 --> 03:56.926
the Secretary welcomed State Counselor Yang to the

03:56.926 --> 04:01.093
State Department also for a meeting on February 28th.

04:01.517 --> 04:04.697
The Secretary of course, also formally met with Wang Yi,

04:04.697 --> 04:07.498
Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Bonn, Germany,

04:07.498 --> 04:11.665
on the margins of the G-24 Administer's Meeting in February.

04:12.762 --> 04:16.199
So I think these calls and visits early in the

04:16.199 --> 04:20.052
Trump Administration with the various counterparts in Asia

04:20.052 --> 04:23.025
show that we are moving quickly to establish good lines

04:23.025 --> 04:27.192
of communication and are seeking to establish very

04:29.058 --> 04:33.225
constructive relations also with our Chinese partners.

04:34.865 --> 04:39.032
We are pursuing a results oriented relationship with China,

04:40.885 --> 04:44.473
one that benefits the American people, and one that remains

04:44.473 --> 04:47.471
faithful to our allies and presses China to abide by

04:47.471 --> 04:49.971
international rules and norms.

04:50.296 --> 04:54.463
Each meeting up to now Secretary Tillerson has urged China

04:54.617 --> 04:58.700
to use all available tools to alter North Korea's

04:59.353 --> 05:03.253
destabilizing behavior, and he's discussed the need to

05:03.253 --> 05:05.987
create a level playing field for trade and investment

05:05.987 --> 05:08.154
between our two countries.

05:08.533 --> 05:12.700
So we expect at each stop on Secretary Tillerson's trip

05:12.771 --> 05:15.631
the discussion will be forward looking,

05:15.631 --> 05:19.798
and will focus on ways that we can strengthen cooperation

05:19.811 --> 05:23.670
in order to advance the security and economic wellbeing

05:23.670 --> 05:27.451
of the American people and of our friends and partners

05:27.451 --> 05:28.284
in Asia.

05:29.568 --> 05:32.071
This visit will be the first of what we envision will be

05:32.071 --> 05:35.071
close ongoing working relationships.

05:36.390 --> 05:39.933
In closing I just want to reiterate, of course you all know,

05:39.933 --> 05:43.746
the U.S. is a Pacific power, and we will certainly be

05:43.746 --> 05:47.913
remaining active and engaged in Asia in this administration.

05:48.378 --> 05:52.545
The visit will focus on our pursuit of a constructive

05:52.804 --> 05:56.671
and results based relationship with China as part of a

05:56.671 --> 06:00.094
larger Asia policy that prioritizes our alliances and

06:00.094 --> 06:03.890
strategic friendships which have been the bedrock of peace

06:03.890 --> 06:06.348
and security in the Asian region.

06:06.348 --> 06:10.515
We will also look to further broaden and enhance U.S.

06:10.934 --> 06:13.871
economic interests in the Asia-Pacific region.

06:13.871 --> 06:17.570
We will continue our security cooperation and seek to

06:17.570 --> 06:20.530
build on our current security cooperation with two

06:20.530 --> 06:24.697
key allies, and we will seek to pursue foreign policy

06:25.405 --> 06:29.238
cooperation on global and regional challenges.

06:29.382 --> 06:33.511
And so with that I'll be happy to take a few questions

06:33.511 --> 06:35.844
before we head out tomorrow.

06:36.068 --> 06:37.749
Thanks all for being here.

06:37.749 --> 06:39.457
- [Andy] As we move to the Q and A portion,

06:39.457 --> 06:41.105
please wait for the microphone,

06:41.105 --> 06:43.508
and state your name and publication for the transcript.

06:43.508 --> 06:46.425
We'll go right there in the middle.

06:47.818 --> 06:50.985
- Thank you, my name is Mee-Gyong Kim,

06:51.675 --> 06:55.508
with (mumbling) Daily, Korea.

06:55.981 --> 07:00.148
Do you expect to announce any new sanctions like against

07:00.978 --> 07:05.145
North Korea, including secondary boycott or financial

07:06.197 --> 07:10.030
sanction against North Korea during this trip?

07:11.050 --> 07:12.251
- Right, thank you.

07:12.251 --> 07:16.418
Well of course, as I mentioned, North Korea's provocative

07:20.547 --> 07:23.657
behavior, its violations of the U.N. Security Council

07:23.657 --> 07:27.824
resolutions have galvanized the international community

07:28.025 --> 07:32.192
and have brought to the fore these two U.N. Security Council

07:33.333 --> 07:36.883
resolutions which have been passed recently imposing

07:36.883 --> 07:40.767
the tightest sanctions regime we've ever had with respect

07:40.767 --> 07:42.017
to North Korea.

07:42.469 --> 07:46.636
That's U.N. Security Council resolutions 2270 and 2321.

07:47.885 --> 07:51.458
I think you all know that the current administration,

07:51.458 --> 07:55.625
especially following on the missile launches that occurred

07:56.141 --> 07:59.812
a couple of weeks ago, is looking very actively at

07:59.812 --> 08:03.558
the issue of North Korea and reviewing its approach

08:03.558 --> 08:07.013
and what kinds of options it is considering.

08:07.013 --> 08:10.644
That process is still ongoing, so although we will

08:10.644 --> 08:14.474
certainly continue to strictly implement the U.N. Security

08:14.474 --> 08:17.503
Council resolutions, and we call on our partners around

08:17.503 --> 08:21.586
the world to continue to actively implement those

08:21.597 --> 08:25.680
resolutions and to maintain the sanctions regime,

08:25.826 --> 08:29.075
we don't have anything new at the moment to announce.

08:29.075 --> 08:31.633
We're intent on keeping up the pressure on the

08:31.633 --> 08:35.800
North Korean regime, and trying to change the calculus

08:36.947 --> 08:40.052
on the part of the North Korean leadership to come back to

08:40.052 --> 08:44.219
the negotiating table and discuss its illegal and very

08:44.938 --> 08:47.521
destabilizing weapons programs.

08:47.755 --> 08:50.168
So I don't think we will have anything new to announce

08:50.168 --> 08:54.335
on this trip, but certainly discussing the elements of any

08:54.445 --> 08:58.612
new approach would be an important part of the discussions.

08:58.657 --> 09:01.490
- [Andy] Okay, we'll go down here.

09:05.304 --> 09:06.184
- Thank you very much.

09:06.184 --> 09:09.267
Ching Chan with Shanghai Media Group.

09:09.723 --> 09:13.890
And I'd like to is Secretary Tillerson's visit paving

09:14.039 --> 09:18.206
the way for the future meeting between President Xi Jinping

09:18.668 --> 09:20.335
and President Trump?

09:20.718 --> 09:24.710
And also we saw since President Trump took office

09:24.710 --> 09:28.877
we saw a very frequent bilateral high level meetings.

09:31.450 --> 09:35.361
So will the U.S. carry on the periodical strategic

09:35.361 --> 09:38.528
(noise interruption).

09:39.171 --> 09:41.868
And also what's the progress of BIT right now?

09:41.868 --> 09:42.701
Thank you.

09:42.877 --> 09:43.710
- Okay.

09:43.990 --> 09:45.152
A series of questions there.

09:45.152 --> 09:46.955
I'll try to take them one by one.

09:46.955 --> 09:48.429
So the first question.

09:48.429 --> 09:51.513
I mean, certainly Secretary Tillerson is our

09:51.513 --> 09:52.841
Secretary of State.

09:52.841 --> 09:56.595
He's in charge of our foreign policy, and of course his trip

09:56.595 --> 10:00.762
will to some extent be paving the way for future high level

10:00.990 --> 10:03.058
meetings between our two presidents.

10:03.058 --> 10:04.402
There's no question about that.

10:04.402 --> 10:08.419
I expect that he will be discussing with the Chinese

10:08.419 --> 10:12.391
interlocutors all of the various challenges and also

10:12.391 --> 10:16.558
areas of cooperation that we are looking to continue

10:16.841 --> 10:20.715
to pursue and continue to discuss and make progress on.

10:20.715 --> 10:24.882
And I think there's been some discussion in the news

10:25.647 --> 10:28.260
recently about high level meetings.

10:28.260 --> 10:31.265
I don't have anything specific to announce on that front,

10:31.265 --> 10:34.817
but I think as you've seen in the communicàtion between

10:34.817 --> 10:37.839
the two presidents themselves, there's been talk of

10:37.839 --> 10:39.256
an early meeting.

10:39.401 --> 10:43.568
So I think Secretary Tillerson's first trip out to China,

10:43.854 --> 10:48.021
of course he's going to be meeting some of the counterparts

10:48.408 --> 10:51.240
for the first time, but he will certainly be looking to

10:51.240 --> 10:55.157
set out the sort of work plan for the bilateral

10:55.579 --> 10:57.657
relationship in the new administration.

10:57.657 --> 10:59.574
So the second question.

11:02.367 --> 11:03.752
- [Ching] Regarding the dialog.

11:03.752 --> 11:06.312
- Oh, the dialog, so yeah, right.

11:06.312 --> 11:08.775
So on the, I mean we have this trip.

11:08.775 --> 11:12.942
Then we will be having continued engagements I think.

11:13.124 --> 11:17.041
I know one thing that the Chinese side has been

11:17.085 --> 11:19.730
interested in is continued high level engagement,

11:19.730 --> 11:22.708
and I think the administration has already signaled

11:22.708 --> 11:25.416
with this trip and talk of a high level meeting in

11:25.416 --> 11:29.583
the future that we will be continuing high level engagement.

11:31.592 --> 11:35.587
As far as the specific form that that's gonna take,

11:35.587 --> 11:39.754
and with regard to the future of this sort of strategic

11:40.681 --> 11:43.112
and economic dialog and some of the other specific

11:43.112 --> 11:47.279
mechanisms, we haven't actually gotten to the point of

11:48.652 --> 11:51.502
discussing how those might be changed or which ones

11:51.502 --> 11:52.752
would continue.

11:53.005 --> 11:55.252
But I think that we're starting the conversation here,

11:55.252 --> 11:56.480
so that's a good thing.

11:56.480 --> 12:00.647
On the BIT, I think there have continued to be rounds of

12:01.766 --> 12:04.676
discussions on the BIT between our working level

12:04.676 --> 12:07.240
counterparts, and I think it's one of the things that

12:07.240 --> 12:10.157
certainly will be part of the discussions coming up

12:10.157 --> 12:13.826
on this trip as to what happens to that negotiation

12:13.826 --> 12:16.826
and whether or not it moves forward.

12:24.694 --> 12:27.934
- Sang (mumbling) from 21st Century Business Herald.

12:27.934 --> 12:31.801
We know that 12 TPP member countries were meeting in

12:31.801 --> 12:35.532
(mumbling) tomorrow for two days meeting,

12:35.532 --> 12:37.782
plus China and South Korea.

12:38.115 --> 12:42.282
And I wonder if State Department have any comments on that.

12:44.475 --> 12:48.642
And as U.S.A. is not a part of the TPP negotiation,

12:49.982 --> 12:54.149
do you foresee that by any chance President Trump will

12:55.855 --> 12:59.300
change his mind and go back to TPP negotiation table?

12:59.300 --> 13:03.467
And do you still see TPP or integration of Asia Pacific

13:06.290 --> 13:10.457
economic interests as a rebalancing of pillar to Asia,

13:11.925 --> 13:15.271
or economic (mumbling) for U.S. presence in

13:15.271 --> 13:16.791
Asia Pacific region?

13:16.791 --> 13:17.624
Thanks.

13:18.315 --> 13:20.620
- Okay, again a series of questions.

13:20.620 --> 13:24.787
Sometimes a little bit complicated, but I'll try to answer.

13:25.098 --> 13:29.265
You know, I think the issue of the U.S. economic engagement

13:30.050 --> 13:32.979
in Asia is the focus on your question,

13:32.979 --> 13:35.812
and I would answer that like this.

13:36.479 --> 13:40.308
This administration certainly recognizes that Asia is

13:40.308 --> 13:44.475
the most dynamic and holds the potential for a lot of

13:45.239 --> 13:49.406
future growth as a region, and that it's very essential

13:49.508 --> 13:53.008
to the future of U.S. economic prosperity.

13:53.254 --> 13:56.483
And so I think what we're looking to do is to approach

13:56.483 --> 14:00.650
our economic engagement with Asia in a way that not only

14:01.547 --> 14:05.555
promotes growth, but also promotes the interests of

14:05.555 --> 14:08.607
the United States, of United States workers,

14:08.607 --> 14:11.422
of United States citizens and United States companies.

14:11.422 --> 14:15.589
So we're looking for a way of, you used the word rebalance,

14:17.395 --> 14:21.562
but leveling the playing field because the feeling is that

14:22.400 --> 14:26.567
the playing field has been tilted against the favor of

14:26.664 --> 14:30.319
some of our companies and some of our interests in the

14:30.319 --> 14:34.431
trade arrangements that have persisted up until now.

14:34.431 --> 14:36.944
And so I think that's what we'll be looking at is how to

14:36.944 --> 14:40.036
certainly engage economically with the region,

14:40.036 --> 14:44.203
but how to make sure that the engagement is fair and

14:44.876 --> 14:46.876
balanced, as you put it.

14:48.036 --> 14:49.257
- [Andy] Okay, we're gonna break away and take

14:49.257 --> 14:50.728
a question from New York.

14:50.728 --> 14:52.895
Please go ahead, New York.

14:53.381 --> 14:57.076
- Hi, this is Manick Methos, syndicated journalist.

14:57.076 --> 15:01.243
I have a question in regard to the tensions currently seen

15:02.169 --> 15:06.336
between North Korea and Malaysia following the assassination

15:08.197 --> 15:12.030
of the stepbrother of the North Korean leader.

15:13.294 --> 15:17.461
Would this issue come up for discussions with China?

15:17.634 --> 15:20.134
And what is your take on that?

15:21.008 --> 15:23.667
What is the State Department's take on that?

15:23.667 --> 15:25.016
Would you like to comment, please?

15:25.016 --> 15:25.849
Thank you.

15:26.759 --> 15:29.248
- Yeah, thank you for the question.

15:29.248 --> 15:33.415
I think our take on this issue is that Malaysian government

15:33.668 --> 15:37.835
has a perfect right to try to defend its citizens and

15:38.262 --> 15:42.429
its territories from attacks on people, whether it be at

15:44.463 --> 15:47.213
their airport or in other venues.

15:47.702 --> 15:50.324
And so we have been very supportive of Malaysian government

15:50.324 --> 15:53.808
efforts to get to the bottom of this attack.

15:53.808 --> 15:57.975
And I think for any kind of detailed discussions on the

15:59.423 --> 16:03.208
tensions between the Malaysian government and the government

16:03.208 --> 16:07.375
of the DPRK, I would have to refer you to the two of them.

16:08.460 --> 16:11.492
I know that there have been some ongoing discussions,

16:11.492 --> 16:15.600
but I don't anticipate, I mean other than our support for

16:15.600 --> 16:19.767
the Malaysian government handling this very difficult issue,

16:19.802 --> 16:22.626
I don't think I have any further comment from the

16:22.626 --> 16:25.043
State Department perspective.

16:27.021 --> 16:30.688
- [Andy] Okay, we'll go to the middle there.

16:38.043 --> 16:39.937
- Okay, thank you very much.

16:39.937 --> 16:43.353
I'm Guzupta from Christian Broadcasting System in Korea,

16:43.353 --> 16:47.128
and there is some speculation that the next president

16:47.128 --> 16:51.211
of Korea will make a different decision about the

16:51.641 --> 16:54.641
self-deployment in Korean Peninsula.

16:55.533 --> 16:59.616
So would you possibly confirm your position about

17:00.940 --> 17:02.273
that deployment?

17:02.802 --> 17:06.969
And then what's gonna be the Secretary Tillerson's actions

17:07.175 --> 17:08.508
during the trip?

17:09.723 --> 17:10.556
Thank you.

17:11.364 --> 17:12.879
- Great, thank you.

17:12.879 --> 17:17.046
Well, just on the first part of your question about the

17:18.396 --> 17:22.063
issue of the political situation in the ROK,

17:23.298 --> 17:25.631
and how we think about that.

17:27.170 --> 17:29.877
I mean, I think what you've seen actually over the past

17:29.877 --> 17:33.399
number of weeks is the unfolding of a pretty transparent

17:33.399 --> 17:37.566
process undergirded by varying democratic institutions,

17:39.806 --> 17:43.954
which have really proven their meddle in the unfolding

17:43.954 --> 17:46.704
of this sort of peaceful process.

17:46.829 --> 17:49.062
It's a difficult process of course, but I think we see

17:49.062 --> 17:52.903
the strength of South Korean democratic institutions

17:52.903 --> 17:54.653
through this process.

17:54.744 --> 17:58.508
And I think we are certainly aware that there's going to be

17:58.508 --> 18:02.405
an upcoming political process and set of new elections

18:02.405 --> 18:06.572
for president coming up, and that there may be candidates

18:07.100 --> 18:10.587
that will be different from those that have been in

18:10.587 --> 18:13.504
the administration in recent years.

18:13.980 --> 18:17.012
As to what it means for the THAAD deployment,

18:17.012 --> 18:20.007
it's very difficult obviously to say since we have no idea

18:20.007 --> 18:24.174
who the candidates are yet, never mind who's going to win.

18:24.200 --> 18:28.367
But I think the way we look at the THAAD deployment is

18:28.666 --> 18:32.833
it's a very, utterly reasonable step for a country to take

18:35.774 --> 18:39.160
which sees itself threatened by missiles from its

18:39.160 --> 18:42.799
northern neighbor, and not only sees itself threatened,

18:42.799 --> 18:45.627
but these threats and these provocations are coming now

18:45.627 --> 18:48.460
with great regularity, and it's very alarming to people

18:48.460 --> 18:52.147
who have to live under that kind of a situation.

18:52.147 --> 18:55.154
So I think for us the THAAD deployment is not related to

18:55.154 --> 18:59.321
some political constellation or other consideration.

18:59.660 --> 19:03.827
It's a very reasonable and real response to a very

19:04.390 --> 19:08.557
provocative threat that is facing people in South Korea.

19:09.726 --> 19:12.553
So you know, I'm sure we'll be continuing to discuss it,

19:12.553 --> 19:16.720
but I really don't think that there's any big mystery

19:17.789 --> 19:21.302
about why people in South Korea should be sort of

19:21.302 --> 19:24.969
feeling the demand signal for such a system.

19:26.897 --> 19:29.149
- [Andy] Okay, we'll come down here.

19:29.149 --> 19:31.649
Be patient for the microphone.

19:33.310 --> 19:36.958
- Thank you very much, Susan, for coming back.

19:36.958 --> 19:39.348
My name is Don Hu Yu with China the Real News Agency

19:39.348 --> 19:40.431
of Hong Kong.

19:41.005 --> 19:45.172
And now that President Trump has said that he will owner

19:46.199 --> 19:50.366
One China policy, could you please state here clearly

19:52.412 --> 19:55.517
representing the Trump administration,

19:55.517 --> 19:58.350
what is the U.S. One China policy?

19:59.055 --> 20:03.222
How would President Trump talk to President Xi in their

20:05.568 --> 20:09.151
possible first meeting in Florida about the

20:09.254 --> 20:11.793
One China policy and Taiwan issue?

20:11.793 --> 20:13.460
Thank you very much.

20:15.003 --> 20:17.213
- It's hard for me to imagine how President Xi will

20:17.213 --> 20:19.892
talk to President Trump about the One China policy,

20:19.892 --> 20:22.687
but I do know what our One China policy is,

20:22.687 --> 20:26.854
which is the policy that was reaffirmed in the phone call

20:26.959 --> 20:28.583
between the two presidents.

20:28.583 --> 20:32.224
So our One China policy, as I'm sure many of you know,

20:32.224 --> 20:36.224
is the same U.S. One China policy that we've had

20:36.261 --> 20:40.428
going back generations and generations of different

20:41.020 --> 20:44.880
secretaries of state all the way back to Henry Kissinger.

20:44.880 --> 20:49.047
It's based on the three joint sino U.S. communiques

20:49.147 --> 20:52.730
that were signed in 1972 and 1979 and 1982.

20:53.876 --> 20:58.043
And it's also based importantly on the Taiwan Relations Act

20:58.565 --> 21:02.732
which is a U.S. law, a piece of legislation signed into law

21:03.514 --> 21:07.681
also in 1979, which provides for the United States robust,

21:09.557 --> 21:13.260
strong and committed unofficial relations between the people

21:13.260 --> 21:15.766
in the United States and the people in Taiwan.

21:15.766 --> 21:19.284
And I think that that has been stated clearly by

21:19.284 --> 21:20.431
President Trump.

21:20.431 --> 21:22.680
It's been understood clearly by President Xi,

21:22.680 --> 21:25.495
and I think that in the follow up conversations that

21:25.495 --> 21:28.112
we've had with our interlocutors in China there doesn't

21:28.112 --> 21:32.279
seem to be any question about, that that's our stated

21:33.568 --> 21:35.651
policy and going forward.

21:36.178 --> 21:40.114
- [Andy] We'll get the gentleman standing in back.

21:40.114 --> 21:42.114
- Hi, Nathan King. CGTN.

21:42.606 --> 21:44.626
I wanna follow up on our Korean colleague's question,

21:44.626 --> 21:46.478
maybe phrase it a bit differently.

21:46.478 --> 21:49.526
Would you respect the sovereignty of the Republic of Korea

21:49.526 --> 21:52.973
if they decided against THAAD and a new government?

21:52.973 --> 21:55.861
And also you said, sorry, I'm just going through

21:55.861 --> 21:57.028
my notes here.

21:57.122 --> 22:00.658
You said you wanted a results based relationship with China.

22:00.658 --> 22:03.788
Can you explain what that means a little bit?

22:03.788 --> 22:04.621
- Sure.

22:05.737 --> 22:08.479
So on the first question, would we respect the sovereignty

22:08.479 --> 22:10.729
of the South Korean polity?

22:12.579 --> 22:14.561
I mean, of course we would respect the sovereignty

22:14.561 --> 22:17.642
of South Korea, so I don't think that that's at issue.

22:17.642 --> 22:20.762
I mean, I think that's not really the question

22:20.762 --> 22:23.182
that's at issue because this decision was made as an

22:23.182 --> 22:24.682
alliance decision.

22:25.596 --> 22:28.378
It was made in consultation and jointly between the

22:28.378 --> 22:32.187
ROK and the United States, and I anticipate that anything

22:32.187 --> 22:34.733
that would happen would be discussed.

22:34.733 --> 22:37.696
But I don't think there's any question that we respect

22:37.696 --> 22:40.069
the sovereignty of South Korea.

22:40.069 --> 22:43.902
On the issue of the, what was the second part?

22:44.895 --> 22:47.228
(crosstalk)

22:47.906 --> 22:49.573
Results based, yeah.

22:50.846 --> 22:55.013
So I think this gets to sort of what I mentioned earlier

22:58.646 --> 23:01.726
in response to the question from the gentleman from

23:01.726 --> 23:05.652
the 21st Century Herald about our engagement economically

23:05.652 --> 23:06.485
with Asia.

23:07.781 --> 23:10.541
I mean, we want to be able to pursue a constructive

23:10.541 --> 23:14.708
discussion with China that enables us to get at sort of

23:15.083 --> 23:18.583
problem areas and make progress on issues.

23:19.026 --> 23:22.757
And I think in certainly the economic and trade

23:22.757 --> 23:26.682
relationship, although it's obviously been a very

23:26.682 --> 23:30.577
bountiful relationship and mutually beneficial,

23:30.577 --> 23:33.091
over the recent period of time there's definitely

23:33.091 --> 23:37.258
a feeling that there is some weighting of the scale,

23:38.260 --> 23:42.427
if we can put it that way, and some areas that need to

23:42.921 --> 23:44.808
be righted in that sense.

23:44.808 --> 23:47.282
So I think we wanna have a discussion where we can

23:47.282 --> 23:49.441
make progress on those issues that we're raising,

23:49.441 --> 23:52.235
and we wanna see that move forward.

23:52.235 --> 23:55.318
That's what we mean by results based.

23:55.319 --> 23:56.458
- [Andy] We'll go all the way in the back

23:56.458 --> 23:57.875
to the gentleman.

24:01.203 --> 24:04.671
- Hi, thank you, Kyle Herdeen from Fugi TV.

24:04.671 --> 24:07.338
So I have two questions for you.

24:07.970 --> 24:12.137
First about the recent North Korean missile launches.

24:12.576 --> 24:15.982
Specifically those missiles were targeted at U.S. bases

24:15.982 --> 24:20.149
in Japan, or at least that's what the testing was for.

24:20.491 --> 24:24.658
So having said that, is Secretary Tillerson going to be

24:24.977 --> 24:27.717
speaking with the Japanese officials about more

24:27.717 --> 24:30.917
defense within Japan, which might include THAAD,

24:30.917 --> 24:34.575
or is he anticipating discussions from the Japanese

24:34.575 --> 24:35.908
on more defense?

24:36.321 --> 24:39.505
And then secondly I wanted to ask about the 38 trademarks

24:39.505 --> 24:41.843
that were recently approved by the Chinese government

24:41.843 --> 24:43.176
on Trump's name.

24:43.566 --> 24:47.733
When Secretary Tillerson is in China, will he be advocating

24:49.144 --> 24:53.003
for future approval of those kinds of trademarks

24:53.003 --> 24:54.170
in the future?

24:55.242 --> 24:59.409
- Okay, so on the first question, I mean I think it stands

25:00.159 --> 25:04.130
to reason that when Secretary Tillerson is in Tokyo

25:04.130 --> 25:06.781
one of the things we have been discussing with them

25:06.781 --> 25:10.948
in the encounters we've had so far in this administration,

25:11.095 --> 25:13.214
but also in the last administration, is how we can

25:13.214 --> 25:17.381
strengthen the alliance, and what more Japan can do

25:17.514 --> 25:20.735
to contribute to the strengthening of the alliance.

25:20.735 --> 25:23.900
And so there will certainly be discussions as there

25:23.900 --> 25:27.817
have been ongoing about future strengthening of

25:28.744 --> 25:31.453
the alliance, and future capabilities that might come

25:31.453 --> 25:33.406
into play to help with that.

25:33.406 --> 25:37.134
So I think it's not as a result so much of the recent

25:37.134 --> 25:40.964
missile launches, but it is part of the ongoing

25:40.964 --> 25:45.131
conversation, and it is partly inspired by the kind of

25:46.001 --> 25:50.141
increasing concern that we have with North Korea's

25:50.141 --> 25:53.527
weapons programs, as they continue to test kind of

25:53.527 --> 25:57.694
on a regular basis over the last year or year and a half.

25:58.225 --> 26:01.808
On the question of the trademarks in China,

26:02.665 --> 26:05.748
so I'm not a patent trademark lawyer,

26:06.327 --> 26:09.944
and I'm not intimately familiar with the details

26:09.944 --> 26:14.111
of these cases, but I'm pretty sure that Secretary Tillerson

26:14.922 --> 26:17.719
will probably not be talking about these kinds

26:17.719 --> 26:19.636
of issues when he goes.

26:20.745 --> 26:22.742
My understanding is that most of these cases have been

26:22.742 --> 26:26.909
hanging around for a long time, and they're kind of,

26:27.708 --> 26:30.079
I don't know if you call it a false flag trademark

26:30.079 --> 26:31.162
registration.

26:31.670 --> 26:35.078
And so a lot of them I think were pretty easily dispatched

26:35.078 --> 26:39.245
through the court process, so I don't think this rises

26:39.408 --> 26:41.905
to the level of something that the Secretary would be

26:41.905 --> 26:46.072
talking about, but that's my understanding anyway.

26:46.754 --> 26:48.907
- [Andy] Okay, we have time for a few more questions.

26:48.907 --> 26:51.022
I'm going to go first to New York.

26:51.022 --> 26:53.189
Please go ahead, New York.

26:54.808 --> 26:57.530
- Hi, my name is Sir Michael Pearson from Dutch newspaper

26:57.530 --> 26:59.863
(mumbling).

27:00.099 --> 27:03.261
A question, Secretary Tillerson was not taking along

27:03.261 --> 27:07.178
the press corps on this trip to Southeast Asia,

27:07.762 --> 27:11.929
nor has he been holding a lot of press conferences so far.

27:13.739 --> 27:14.946
Could you comment on that?

27:14.946 --> 27:19.113
He seems sometimes to be a bit isolated with regard

27:19.477 --> 27:22.060
to the press and to the public.

27:24.202 --> 27:26.452
Well, your comment, please.

27:27.196 --> 27:31.363
- Our press spokesperson, acting spokesperson Mark Toner

27:33.380 --> 27:35.581
has spoken quite a bit from the podium at the

27:35.581 --> 27:37.800
State Department on this issue.

27:37.800 --> 27:40.894
But I would say just with regard to the trip to

27:40.894 --> 27:43.880
Northeast Asia, there are about 20 journalists that

27:43.880 --> 27:47.455
are gonna be flying out I think to Northeast Asia

27:47.455 --> 27:49.911
to join with the trip, and we're making all the

27:49.911 --> 27:52.839
arrangements so that they can cover all of the events

27:52.839 --> 27:56.006
where the press is gonna be convening.

27:58.136 --> 28:01.641
So I don't think we've had so much of a problem in

28:01.641 --> 28:05.808
getting the press to travel, and we're making all the

28:05.837 --> 28:08.162
arrangements on the ground for them to be there.

28:08.162 --> 28:10.412
I know Secretary Tillerson.

28:10.493 --> 28:12.824
You know, it's very early days in the administration.

28:12.824 --> 28:16.991
Secretary Tillerson was only confirmed a couple of

28:17.006 --> 28:20.606
months ago, and he's been very busy in the time since

28:20.606 --> 28:23.376
trying to sort of get up to speed and have a lot of

28:23.376 --> 28:26.827
these different issues that all of the administration

28:26.827 --> 28:29.777
and cabinet officials are looking at and reviewing.

28:29.777 --> 28:33.710
And so I think we're certainly, we've got the State

28:33.710 --> 28:37.309
Department press briefing back up online now,

28:37.309 --> 28:39.954
and I think you're gonna start to see more and more

28:39.954 --> 28:41.537
engagement from us.

28:41.872 --> 28:45.501
I think the Secretary is doing a press conference

28:45.501 --> 28:48.501
in Toyko with his counterpart there,

28:49.126 --> 28:52.459
and so we'll look for him to be engaged.

28:53.865 --> 28:58.032
I wouldn't at all condone the moniker of being isolated.

29:01.296 --> 29:03.716
- [Andy] Okay, for a final question we'll go to

29:03.716 --> 29:07.216
the lady right there, sitting right there.

29:09.324 --> 29:11.797
- Thank you, Elise Heras from NHK.

29:11.797 --> 29:14.057
I noticed you shied away earlier from the word

29:14.057 --> 29:16.098
rebalance, and I was wondering if you could clarify

29:16.098 --> 29:18.787
this administration's position on the pivot or

29:18.787 --> 29:20.144
rebalance to Asia?

29:20.144 --> 29:22.915
And also do you have any updates to share on the schedule,

29:22.915 --> 29:27.082
specifically will there be anything in any of the stops

29:27.624 --> 29:30.457
other than the bilateral meetings?

29:30.558 --> 29:32.920
- So the second thing was about the schedule?

29:32.920 --> 29:36.389
- If Secretary Tillerson will be making any stops

29:36.389 --> 29:40.367
other than the bilateral meetings in each of the countries?

29:40.367 --> 29:43.092
- Yeah, so just to pick up the point on the schedule,

29:43.092 --> 29:45.092
I don't have anything to announce on the details

29:45.092 --> 29:46.096
of the schedule.

29:46.096 --> 29:48.418
I'm only sort of going over the official meetings.

29:48.418 --> 29:51.510
I'm not sure, I don't think all the details on all of

29:51.510 --> 29:54.471
the other activities have been nailed down yet.

29:54.471 --> 29:58.554
So I'll leave that to our press office and the PA

29:58.905 --> 30:01.645
folks to release the details on that.

30:01.645 --> 30:05.801
On the issue of pivot, rebalance, etc., I mean that was

30:05.801 --> 30:09.968
a word that was used to described the Asia policy in

30:10.067 --> 30:11.795
the last administration.

30:11.795 --> 30:14.119
I think you can probably expect that this administration

30:14.119 --> 30:18.286
will have its own formulation, and it hasn't actually,

30:20.204 --> 30:24.287
we haven't really seen in detail kind of what the

30:25.675 --> 30:29.842
formulation will be, or if there even will be a formulation.

30:30.456 --> 30:32.921
But what I outlined in my opening is kind of the broad

30:32.921 --> 30:35.103
strokes of what the messaging is.

30:35.103 --> 30:37.229
We're gonna remain engaged and active in Asia.

30:37.229 --> 30:41.396
The Asian economy is very important for U.S. prosperity

30:41.624 --> 30:45.791
and growth, and so we'll be there working on fair trade

30:47.599 --> 30:49.432
and free trade issues.

30:50.031 --> 30:53.689
We're working on regional security challenges such as

30:53.689 --> 30:57.497
North Korea, and continue to press for a rules based

30:57.497 --> 31:01.664
and sort of construction, peaceful, stable order in Asia.

31:02.997 --> 31:06.657
And whether there will be a kind of a bumper sticker

31:06.657 --> 31:09.631
to put on that at some point, it's still like I said

31:09.631 --> 31:12.528
it's early days, so I think it's early to say.

31:12.528 --> 31:15.655
- [Reporter] Susan, can you take one question on Taiwan?

31:15.655 --> 31:17.442
- I took one question on Taiwan.

31:17.442 --> 31:18.792
(laughing)

31:18.792 --> 31:20.125
It's up to Andy.

31:21.287 --> 31:22.554
- [Andy] I do, I'm sorry, we're out of time.

31:22.554 --> 31:24.024
Thank you all for coming.

31:24.024 --> 31:25.655
This event is now concluded.

31:25.655 --> 31:26.655
- Oh, sorry.

31:26.952 --> 31:29.202
(laughing)

31:29.759 --> 31:32.092
(crosstalk)

